<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stupididea.com/2008/05/24/update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stupididea.com/2008/05/24/update/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:22:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: method</title>
		<link>http://www.stupididea.com/2008/05/24/update/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>method</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stupididea.com/?p=86#comment-87</guid>
		<description>So he traveled onwards or onward, or he traveled to Mexico and onward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So he traveled onwards or onward, or he traveled to Mexico and onward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: method</title>
		<link>http://www.stupididea.com/2008/05/24/update/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>method</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stupididea.com/?p=86#comment-237</guid>
		<description>So he traveled onwards or onward, or he traveled to Mexico and onward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So he traveled onwards or onward, or he traveled to Mexico and onward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hb</title>
		<link>http://www.stupididea.com/2008/05/24/update/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>hb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stupididea.com/?p=86#comment-86</guid>
		<description>A little googling produces some interesting results. From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bartleby.com/68/92/4292.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bartleby&lt;/a&gt;: onwards is an adverb, while onward is both an adjective and an adverb.  I had thought it would be similar to &quot;towards&quot; vs &quot;toward,&quot; where I already knew that the rule is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bartleby.com/68/11/6111.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nonexistent&lt;/a&gt; because it&#039;s just an American vs. British usage question.

I think I agree on whether there should be philosophy students. Have to hear more about that to be sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little googling produces some interesting results. From <a href="http://www.bartleby.com/68/92/4292.html" rel="nofollow">Bartleby</a>: onwards is an adverb, while onward is both an adjective and an adverb.  I had thought it would be similar to &#8220;towards&#8221; vs &#8220;toward,&#8221; where I already knew that the rule is <a href="http://www.bartleby.com/68/11/6111.html" rel="nofollow">nonexistent</a> because it&#8217;s just an American vs. British usage question.</p>
<p>I think I agree on whether there should be philosophy students. Have to hear more about that to be sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hb</title>
		<link>http://www.stupididea.com/2008/05/24/update/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>hb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stupididea.com/?p=86#comment-236</guid>
		<description>A little googling produces some interesting results. From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bartleby.com/68/92/4292.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bartleby&lt;/a&gt;: onwards is an adverb, while onward is both an adjective and an adverb.  I had thought it would be similar to &quot;towards&quot; vs &quot;toward,&quot; where I already knew that the rule is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bartleby.com/68/11/6111.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nonexistent&lt;/a&gt; because it&#039;s just an American vs. British usage question.

I think I agree on whether there should be philosophy students. Have to hear more about that to be sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little googling produces some interesting results. From <a href="http://www.bartleby.com/68/92/4292.html" rel="nofollow">Bartleby</a>: onwards is an adverb, while onward is both an adjective and an adverb.  I had thought it would be similar to &#8220;towards&#8221; vs &#8220;toward,&#8221; where I already knew that the rule is <a href="http://www.bartleby.com/68/11/6111.html" rel="nofollow">nonexistent</a> because it&#8217;s just an American vs. British usage question.</p>
<p>I think I agree on whether there should be philosophy students. Have to hear more about that to be sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

